In class on Tuesday, we discussed the various stages of goal-setting
that a person might go through according to the Hindu belief system.
The stages were pleasure, worldly success, service for the benefit of
others, and then eventual release from the cycle of life and death along
with the dissipation of the self as a separate being. While I do like
the ideas of this worldview, there seems to have been at least one
important feature of life on Earth which it neglected to mention - that
of emotional attachment.
The first category of pleasure
includes certain kinds of interpersonal relations, such as sexual
relations. However, relations which are purely emotional (friendship or
non-sexual love, for example - the two may or may not be the same
thing) seem unlikely to fall under the same category. Worldly success
obviously does not apply to these relationships, as being in them does
not usually get one any sort of material benefit, and even if it does it
is still not the central reason for having the relationship. Service
to others similarly does not work; friendship is a two-way street (or a
more-than-two-way street), so to speak, so being in a relationship of
that sort is simultaneously beneficial to both or all people involved.
If
one does succeed in escaping the cycle of reincarnation, one will
become a fully integrated part of the universe. However, one will lose
everything that made one unique and a separate, self-coherent entity.
This includes personality. If one had a group of very close friends,
whom one loved very much, even if all the friends left the cycle at once
at at the same time as one did one would still be 'losing' those
friends, so to speak; their personalities, as well as one's own
personality, would vanish. If one liked these friends for their
personalities (which is, I would say, the best reason for liking them),
one would effectively be losing these friends as soon as one or all of
them left the reincarnation cycle.
It occurred to me
that the reason the originators of this sort of thinking may have
neglected to think of emotional bonds such as the ones mentioned above
is that they may not have observed or experienced such bonds. For most
people, friendships are relatively casual relationships; the only sort
of really close relationship they experience is romantic. While a good
number of romantic relationships do include incredibly close emotional
bonds, on the surface they may appear to be based primarily on sex; so,
if the people who came up with the system had not personally been in any
romantic relationships (or any peculiarly close friendships/other
non-sexual love-based relationships), they might not have realized the
intensity of certain types of emotional attachment.
You bring up some good points about how close relationships can be. It can seem wrong to join a crowd because it feels like we’re losing our identity and what makes us each special, but I don't think those trying to achieve Moksha see it like this...
ReplyDeletePlease continue over to my blog where my response would be easier to read. Let me know what you think! =)